PRELIMINARY DATA - NOT FOR PUBLICATION TABLE 10. SUMMARY OF TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FOR BUFFALAGRASS CULTIVARS IN THE 2002 NATIONAL BUFFALAGRASS TEST 1/ 2003 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ STATISTICS FOR ALL LOCATIONS ALL LOCATIONS SUM OF HIGHEST LOWEST MAXIMUM NAME MEAN 1/ RANK 2/ RANKS 3/ RANK 4/ RANK 5/ RANK 6/ IN TOP 25% 7/ 378 5.2 4 41 7 2 10 14.3 609 4.4 10 56 9 2 10 14.3 BISON 5.2 5 39 6 1 10 28.6 BOWIE 5.5 3 28 3 3 6 14.3 DENSITY 4.9 8 27 2 1 10 42.9 FRONTIER TURFALLO 4.9 7 32 5 1 9 28.6 LEGACY 5.6 2 32 5 1 9 42.9 NE 95-55 5.0 6 51 8 5 9 0.0 SWI-2000 5.7 1 26 1 1 6 28.6 TEXOKA 4.6 9 57 10 4 10 0.0 LSD VALUE 0.4 C.V. (%) 11.5 */ TO DETERMINE STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, SUBTRACT ONE ENTRY'S MEAN FROM ANOTHER ENTRY'S MEAN. STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES OCCUR WHEN THIS VALUE IS LARGER THAN THE CORRESPONDING LSD VALUE (LSD 0.05). **/ C.V. (COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION) INDICATES THE PERCENT VARIATION OF THE MEAN IN EACH COLUMN. 1/ MEAN - AN AVERAGE OF ALL THE TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS FROM ALL LOCATIONS. 2/ RANK - RANKING OF THE MEAN OF ALL QUALITY RATINGS. 3/ SUM OF RANKS - A SUM OF ALL THE RANKINGS FROM THE VARIOUS LOCATIONS. 4/ RANK - THE RANKING OF THE SUM OF RANKS. 5/ HIGHEST RANK - THE HIGHEST RANKING ACHIEVED BY THAT ENTRY AT ANY ONE LOCATION. 6/ LOWEST RANK - THE LOWEST RANKING ACHIEVED BY THAT ENTRY AT ANY ONE LOCATION. 7/ MAXIMUM IN TOP 25% - THE PERCENTAGE OF LOCATIONS WHERE THAT ENTRY FINISHED IN THE TOP 25% OF ALL ENTRIES.