TABLE 5. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER LOW INPUT FOR EACH YEAR IN THE U.S. AND CANADA 1/ 1996-2000 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 MEAN BAR VB 3115B 10 1 1 1 11 1 EAGLETON 2 3 2 2 7 2 BARONIE 1 7 3 6 1 3 NORTH STAR (PST-A7-60) 3 5 4 9 14 4 CALIBER 5 6 7 4 10 5 BARON 8 2 6 12 16 6 CANTERBURY 7 11 5 7 2 7 BARIRIS (BAR VB 5649) 9 8 12 8 13 8 BARTITIA 6 9 8 16 12 9 BARITONE (BAR VB 233) 4 4 16 11 20 10 DRAGON (ZPS-429) 13 10 9 10 4 11 SOUTH DAKOTA 14 16 14 5 5 12 KENBLUE 11 20 17 3 17 13 BH 95-199 12 12 11 15 6 14 MTT 683 15 18 10 13 3 15 BLUE STAR 17 14 13 17 15 16 PST-B9-196 20 13 15 14 8 17 VB 16015 18 19 19 18 9 18 BARUZO 16 15 18 19 19 19 BAR VB 6820 21 17 20 20 21 20 LIPOA 19 21 21 21 18 21 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 4. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".