TABLE 3.                            RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS CULTIVARS
                                            GROWN UNDER LOW INPUT AT NINETEEN LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. AND CANADA  1/
                                                                        1996-2000 DATA

                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=LOWEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/

       NAME                     IA1   IL1   KY1   MI1   MO1   NC1   NE1   NJ1    NJ2   OH1   OK1   ON1   PA1   QE1   RI1   UB1   UT1   VA1   WA1   MEAN

       BAR VB 3115B               2     1    16     1     7    14     1     1    2.0     9     6     5    11    15     3     1     8     4    10     1
       EAGLETON                   1     5     8    19    10    12     2     3    1.0     1     8     3     1     7     5     7     6     6     5     2
       BARONIE                    8     8     1     3    14     1     3     7   18.0    10     1     1    10    13    13     9     7     9    13     3
       NORTH STAR (PST-A7-60)    14    11    13    14     1     7    12     4    3.5     3    10     4    16    14     1     8     3    12     3     4
       CALIBER                    4     2     7     5     9    15     4    13   10.5    11     4    10     8     3     8    14    10     1    11     5
       BARON                      9    13     5    12     6     4    13    12    3.5    13     9     8     7    12    11     4     5    11     2     6
       CANTERBURY                 7     7     2     8    16     6     6    11   15.5    19     2    18     9     1    15    18    20     8    12     7
       BARIRIS (BAR VB 5649)     12     9    17     2    11    11     7     8    7.5     4    13    15     5     8     2     5     9     7     9     8
       BARTITIA                  10     4    15    11     2    10     8     2    9.0     2    17     6    13    11    12     6    17    19    15     9
       BARITONE (BAR VB 233)      6     3    20     7     8     8    11     5   15.5     5    11     2     2     4     7     3    14    20     7    10
       DRAGON (ZPS-429)          16    12     3    20    18    16     5    10    7.5     7     5     9    14     5     6    10    19    15    17    11
       SOUTH DAKOTA               5     6     9     9     4    18    17    18    5.0    20    14     7     3     6     9    17    16     5    20    12
       KENBLUE                    3    10    11     4    12    19    18    19   12.0    21     3    13     4    16     4    20    18     2    21    13
       BH 95-199                 13    21    10    10    19     2     9     9   17.0    15    12    19    15     9    14    15    11    17    16    14
       MTT 683                   19    17    14     6     3     9    19    16   19.0     6    18    12     6    10    18    11     2    18     4    15
       BLUE STAR                 11    14     6    13    13    13    14    21   14.0    16    15    11    20    19    16    19    12    14    14    16
       PST-B9-196                17    19     4    18    20     5    10    15    6.0    18     7    16    12    21    20     2    21    13    19    17
       VB 16015                  18    20    12    21    21     3    15    17   13.0     8    16    17    19    17    21    16    15    10     6    18
       BARUZO                    15    15    18    15    15    21    20     6   21.0    12    20    14    18     2    19    21     1     3     8    19
       BAR VB 6820               21    18    21    16    17    20    21    14   10.5    17    19    20    17    18    10    12     4    16     1    20
       LIPOA                     20    16    19    17     5    17    16    20   20.0    14    21    21    21    20    17    13    13    21    18    21

 1/  THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR
     ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS.  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1.

 2/  RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.
     FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".