TABLE 4D. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS AT TWO LOCATIONS GROWN UNDER SHADE 1/ 1999-2002 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME NE1 MI2 MEAN JASPER II 6.2 5.1 5.9 PATHFINDER 5.5 6.1 5.7 SALSA 5.3 5.8 5.4 BARGENA III (BAR CF 8 FUS1) 5.0 5.6 5.2 PST-4FR 5.2 4.9 5.1 COMMON CREEPING RED 4.3 5.4 4.5 ROSE (ASC 087) 4.5 4.8 4.4 SHADEMASTER II 4.2 5.0 4.4 BOREAL 4.1 5.2 4.4 ABT-CR-2 4.2 5.1 4.3 ABT-CR-3 4.2 4.9 4.3 SHADEMARK 4.0 4.9 4.1 ASC 082 3.6 5.6 4.0 NAVIGATOR (CIS FRR 5) 3.6 5.2 4.0 INVERNESS (PST-47TCR) 3.7 5.2 3.9 DGSC 94 3.6 4.9 3.8 SRX 52961 3.6 4.5 3.6 ABERDEEN (PST-EFL) 3.5 5.0 3.6 ASC 172 3.1 5.1 3.6 FLORENTINE 3.2 5.1 3.5 CINDY LOU (CIS FRR 7) 3.1 4.7 3.3 SR 5210 (SRX 52LAV) 2.8 4.6 3.1 LSD VALUE 2.4 1.4 2.0 C.V. (%) 37.3 18.9 34.6 1/ TO DETERMINE STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, SUBTRACT ONE ENTRY'S MEAN FROM ANOTHER ENTRY'S MEAN. STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES OCCUR WHEN THIS VALUE IS LARGER THAN THE CORRESPONDING LSD VALUE (LSD 0.05). 2/ C.V. (COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION) INDICATES THE PERCENT VARIATION OF THE MEAN IN EACH COLUMN.