TABLE 2D. MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN AT ELEVEN LOCATIONS GROWN UNDER MEDIUM INPUT 1/ 2001 DATA TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS 1-9; 9=IDEAL TURF 2/ NAME CA1 IA1 IN1 KY1 MD1 MO1 NJ1 NJ2 NS1 OK1 PA1 MEAN CINDY LOU (CIS FRR 7) 6.2 6.1 6.1 7.0 5.0 3.3 6.3 5.6 6.8 4.2 4.8 5.6 SRX 52961 6.0 6.4 5.6 7.7 4.8 3.3 6.1 5.4 6.4 4.2 4.6 5.5 JASPER II 6.4 6.1 5.9 7.2 5.2 3.2 6.4 5.2 6.2 3.7 4.7 5.5 NAVIGATOR (CIS FRR 5) 6.3 5.3 5.6 6.9 5.2 3.4 6.5 5.3 5.9 4.1 4.9 5.4 ABERDEEN (PST-EFL) 6.6 6.1 5.4 6.8 4.9 3.5 5.6 5.2 6.5 4.0 5.0 5.4 ABT-CR-3 5.8 6.0 5.6 7.3 4.9 3.0 5.9 5.0 6.3 3.6 5.2 5.3 ABT-CR-2 5.9 5.8 5.3 6.8 3.8 2.9 4.2 5.0 4.1 5.2 4.2 4.8 PATHFINDER 6.3 5.0 5.3 6.3 3.0 3.8 4.6 4.5 5.5 4.0 3.6 4.7 SR 5210 (SRX 52LAV) 5.6 5.1 5.3 6.8 4.7 3.1 4.9 4.4 4.2 2.9 4.4 4.7 SHADEMASTER II 5.9 4.9 4.6 6.6 2.8 3.4 3.6 4.8 4.4 3.6 4.1 4.4 DGSC 94 6.0 5.4 5.0 6.5 2.8 3.3 4.5 4.5 3.9 2.7 3.5 4.4 ASC 082 5.4 5.3 4.7 5.6 3.2 3.1 4.9 4.8 4.7 2.3 3.6 4.3 BARGENA III (BAR CF 8 FUS1) 6.1 5.7 4.8 6.0 3.1 3.4 3.7 4.2 4.6 2.1 3.6 4.3 FLORENTINE 5.5 5.5 5.1 6.8 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.4 4.0 1.2 4.1 4.3 PST-4FR 6.7 5.7 5.0 5.9 3.0 3.6 3.0 4.4 4.2 1.8 4.0 4.3 SALSA 5.3 6.2 4.8 5.5 3.0 3.3 3.1 3.6 4.2 3.0 3.7 4.2 INVERNESS (PST-47TCR) 5.8 5.2 4.6 5.9 3.3 3.1 3.1 4.0 3.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 ASC 172 4.7 5.2 4.9 5.5 3.9 2.9 3.7 4.0 3.5 4.2 3.1 4.1 SHADEMARK 5.6 5.9 4.7 5.4 2.8 3.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 1.8 3.6 4.1 ROSE (ASC 087) 5.8 4.8 4.3 5.9 3.2 3.0 3.9 3.7 3.0 1.6 3.4 3.9 BOREAL 5.3 5.9 4.3 5.0 3.3 3.3 2.2 3.2 3.6 1.6 3.9 3.8 COMMON CREEPING RED 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.1 3.4 3.1 2.8 3.7 3.6 1.4 3.9 3.8 LSD VALUE 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.7 3.3 2.0 0.7 0.4 C.V. (%) 6.2 9.2 6.4 6.8 7.0 18.1 12.3 9.1 44.2 36.0 11.0 17.6 1/ TO DETERMINE STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, SUBTRACT ONE ENTRY'S MEAN FROM ANOTHER ENTRY'S MEAN. STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES OCCUR WHEN THIS VALUE IS LARGER THAN THE CORRESPONDING LSD VALUE (LSD 0.05). 2/ C.V. (COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION) INDICATES THE PERCENT VARIATION OF THE MEAN IN EACH COLUMN.