TABLE 3D. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN AT TWENTY-NINE LOCATIONS (FULL SUN) IN THE U.S. AND CANADA 1/ 2000 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AR1 CA1 IA1 IL1 IN1 KS1 KY1 MA1 MD1 ME1 ME2 MI1 MO1 MT1 NC1 MEAN CINDY LOU (ISI FRR 7) 8.5 2.0 7.0 6.5 4.0 2.0 5.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 9.0 4.0 1 JASPER II 1.0 4.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.5 4.5 4.0 16.5 3.0 3.0 7.5 2.0 2 SRX 52961 3.0 16.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 6.5 1.0 2.0 10.5 5.0 6.0 3 NAVIGATOR (ISI FRR 5) 2.0 9.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 4.5 7.0 5.0 11.0 4.5 1.5 10.5 1.0 4 ABT-CR-3 4.0 12.5 7.0 16.0 5.0 13.0 3.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 10.5 6.0 7.5 3.0 5 PST-EFL 6.0 6.5 9.5 6.5 7.0 5.0 6.0 11.0 3.0 9.0 16.5 4.5 8.5 2.0 12.0 6 ABT-CR-2 5.0 8.0 12.5 12.5 9.0 6.0 2.0 9.0 6.0 6.5 5.5 16.5 5.0 17.0 11.0 7 PST-47TCR 18.0 15.0 12.5 9.0 6.0 15.5 11.5 12.5 11.0 8.0 10.0 6.5 10.5 4.0 15.0 8 PST-4FR 12.0 1.0 2.0 6.5 12.5 15.5 14.0 3.0 8.0 12.0 2.0 16.5 4.0 3.0 13.5 9 PATHFINDER 10.0 9.5 14.0 11.0 14.0 7.5 9.0 7.5 13.5 13.0 8.0 8.0 1.5 6.0 5.0 10 FLORENTINE 22.0 17.0 17.5 14.0 16.0 19.0 10.0 15.0 9.5 2.0 5.5 12.0 13.5 1.0 9.0 11 BAR CF 8 FUS1 7.0 5.0 5.0 19.5 10.0 15.5 13.0 18.0 18.0 11.0 4.0 6.5 12.0 15.0 13.5 12 SR 5210 (SRX 52LAV) 16.0 18.0 17.5 6.5 8.0 3.0 8.0 16.0 9.5 20.0 20.0 19.0 16.0 20.0 7.0 13 SHADEMASTER II 15.0 6.5 15.5 12.5 18.0 11.0 16.0 14.0 13.5 16.0 13.5 13.0 8.5 12.0 8.0 14 DGSC 94 13.0 3.0 11.0 10.0 15.0 15.5 11.5 10.0 16.0 10.0 12.0 16.5 13.5 10.5 18.0 15 ASC 082 17.0 14.0 19.0 19.5 12.5 12.0 17.0 12.5 19.0 19.0 19.0 16.5 15.0 18.5 10.0 16 SALSA 14.0 19.0 1.0 3.0 20.0 7.5 19.5 7.5 16.0 17.0 7.0 9.0 22.0 15.0 21.0 17 SHADEMARK 11.0 12.5 15.5 15.0 11.0 10.0 15.0 17.0 12.0 14.5 15.0 10.5 17.5 18.5 16.5 18 ROSE (ASC 087) 8.5 11.0 9.5 17.0 19.0 18.0 19.5 19.0 16.0 21.0 18.0 14.0 21.0 15.0 20.0 19 ASC 172 21.0 21.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 21.0 20.0 14.5 13.5 21.0 20.0 22.0 19.0 20 BOREAL 20.0 20.0 20.0 19.5 17.0 21.0 21.0 20.0 22.0 22.0 21.0 20.0 17.5 13.0 16.5 21 COMMON CREEPING RED 19.0 22.0 21.0 19.5 21.0 20.0 22.0 22.0 21.0 18.0 22.0 22.0 19.0 21.0 22.0 22 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5". TABLE 3D. (CONT'D) RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN AT TWENTY-NINE LOCATIONS (FULL SUN) IN THE U.S. AND CANADA 1/ 2000 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME NJ1 NJ2 NS1 NY1 OK1 PA1 QE1 RI1 SD1 UT1 VA1 WA1 WA3 WI1 MEAN CINDY LOU (ISI FRR 7) 2.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 1 3.5 1.0 9.5 1.0 1.0 3.0 13.0 4.0 1 JASPER II 1.0 3.0 1.0 14.0 7.0 3 11.5 8.5 9.5 3.0 2.5 9.0 11.0 1.0 2 SRX 52961 3.0 2.0 2.0 20.0 2.0 5 1.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 6.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 3 NAVIGATOR (ISI FRR 5) 6.0 5.0 6.0 22.0 1.0 2 2.0 6.0 3.0 13.0 5.0 13.5 7.0 2.0 4 ABT-CR-3 4.0 6.0 3.5 2.0 10.0 4 6.0 2.0 5.0 14.0 2.5 10.0 2.0 3.0 5 PST-EFL 5.0 4.0 5.0 18.5 4.0 6 8.5 7.0 12.0 6.0 4.0 11.5 11.0 7.0 6 ABT-CR-2 10.5 7.0 14.5 15.5 14.0 12 8.5 5.0 15.0 9.0 9.5 5.5 6.0 16.5 7 PST-47TCR 9.0 10.0 20.5 1.0 5.0 9 3.5 4.0 6.5 12.0 13.0 11.5 11.0 13.5 8 PST-4FR 15.5 19.5 13.0 7.0 18.0 11 11.5 16.0 12.0 5.0 16.0 5.5 5.0 11.0 9 PATHFINDER 15.5 13.5 7.0 5.5 8.5 17 14.5 19.0 6.5 7.0 9.5 4.0 8.0 15.0 10 FLORENTINE 8.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 15.5 13 10.0 8.5 4.0 2.0 14.0 2.0 17.0 10.0 11 BAR CF 8 FUS1 10.5 16.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 14 14.5 10.0 12.0 19.0 15.0 8.0 4.0 13.5 12 SR 5210 (SRX 52LAV) 14.0 8.0 16.5 13.0 17.0 7 6.0 14.0 18.5 17.0 11.0 13.5 19.0 9.0 13 SHADEMASTER II 7.0 15.0 11.0 21.0 11.0 16 6.0 18.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 15.0 15.5 8.0 14 DGSC 94 13.0 12.0 14.5 4.0 6.0 18 14.5 20.0 16.0 10.5 12.0 19.5 9.0 16.5 15 ASC 082 12.0 10.0 9.0 17.0 15.5 8 20.5 12.0 22.0 15.5 8.0 19.5 14.0 20.0 16 SALSA 21.0 21.0 12.0 18.5 20.0 21 14.5 15.0 2.0 10.5 18.0 16.5 1.0 6.0 17 SHADEMARK 19.0 13.5 20.5 8.5 12.0 22 19.0 13.0 14.0 19.0 18.0 16.5 15.5 21.5 18 ROSE (ASC 087) 17.0 17.0 19.0 15.5 13.0 19 18.0 11.0 18.5 15.5 18.0 7.0 21.0 18.0 19 ASC 172 18.0 18.0 22.0 12.0 19.0 10 22.0 17.0 20.0 21.0 20.0 18.0 22.0 21.5 20 BOREAL 22.0 19.5 18.0 11.0 22.0 15 17.0 21.0 21.0 19.0 21.0 21.0 20.0 19.0 21 COMMON CREEPING RED 20.0 22.0 16.5 5.5 21.0 20 20.5 22.0 17.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 12.0 22 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".