TABLE 3B. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN AT TWENTY-NINE LOCATIONS (FULL SUN) IN THE U.S. AND CANADA 1/ 1999 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME CA1 CO1 IA1 IL1 IN1 KS1 KY1 MA1 MD1 ME1 ME2 MI1 MO1 MT1 NC1 NJ1 NJ2 NS1 NY1 OK1 PA1 QE1 RI1 SD1 UT1 VA1 WA1 WA3 WI1 MEAN LONGFELLOW II 7.0 22.0 1.5 4.5 1.0 3 4.5 1.5 3.0 1.0 2.0 10.5 2.0 3.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 8.0 22.0 1.0 5.0 4.0 4.5 7.0 1.0 7.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 1 AMBASSADOR 3.0 15.5 10.0 19.5 5.0 7 3.0 1.5 1.0 11.5 6.0 14.0 6.5 8.0 8.0 6.0 3.0 22.0 3.5 4.0 7.0 21.5 13.0 3.0 21.5 14.5 3.0 4.0 17.5 2 ABT-CHW-3 18.5 4.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 5 4.5 4.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 17.0 6.5 13.0 22.0 5.0 7.0 6.5 17.0 17.0 3.0 17.5 8.5 2.0 19.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 3 ABT-CHW-2 9.5 3.0 7.0 19.5 16.5 11 6.0 13.0 5.5 3.0 18.5 6.0 3.0 13.0 23.0 2.0 1.0 10.0 7.0 2.0 8.0 17.5 8.5 1.0 10.0 17.5 2.0 6.0 21.0 4 INTRIGUE 15.0 14.0 1.5 12.0 8.0 7 1.5 6.5 2.0 7.0 10.5 1.5 21.0 21.5 21.0 3.0 8.0 13.0 1.0 15.5 4.0 4.0 1.0 17.0 2.0 22.0 8.5 1.0 14.5 5 TREAZURE (E) 8.0 12.0 14.0 4.5 21.0 4 9.0 5.0 7.0 11.5 16.5 3.0 10.0 5.0 14.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 15.0 10.0 1.0 17.5 16.0 21.5 17.0 11.0 13.0 14.0 8.0 6 CULOMBRA 21.0 2.0 7.0 1.5 2.5 7 10.0 8.0 21.5 21.0 8.0 10.5 4.5 2.0 12.0 18.5 13.0 1.0 20.0 5.5 16.0 1.0 2.0 14.5 4.0 3.0 5.0 15.0 14.5 7 PICK FRC A-93 4.5 19.0 22.0 9.0 13.0 14 1.5 14.5 8.0 15.0 3.5 6.0 12.0 10.5 18.5 8.0 17.0 16.0 11.0 12.0 10.5 12.0 6.0 4.0 10.0 7.5 1.0 13.0 10.0 8 SHADOW II 9.5 7.0 3.0 24.0 14.5 24 7.0 3.0 9.0 11.5 24.0 18.0 8.0 19.0 20.0 7.0 5.0 10.0 7.0 18.5 12.0 17.5 7.0 7.0 5.0 4.0 22.0 2.0 11.5 9 TIFFANY 4.5 15.5 4.0 7.0 18.0 18 16.0 10.5 13.5 9.0 14.0 21.0 14.0 21.5 7.0 13.0 23.0 18.0 2.0 13.0 19.5 12.0 22.0 23.0 10.0 2.0 11.0 11.0 5.5 10 SILHOUETTE (PICK FRC 4-92) 16.5 20.0 14.0 16.0 2.5 22 12.0 16.0 21.5 2.0 12.5 12.5 18.0 5.0 2.5 14.0 18.5 4.0 7.0 14.0 21.0 12.0 20.0 12.5 12.0 20.0 8.5 9.0 19.5 11 ACF 092 11.0 17.0 16.0 7.0 10.5 2 20.5 21.0 5.5 22.0 22.0 4.0 12.0 23.0 15.0 17.0 11.0 21.0 17.0 9.0 6.0 12.0 10.5 14.5 6.5 9.0 20.0 8.0 11.5 12 BAR CHF 8 FUS2 6.0 23.0 7.0 21.5 6.0 12 22.0 18.5 15.0 11.5 6.0 8.0 15.5 8.0 16.5 23.0 6.0 14.0 13.5 20.0 14.0 21.5 4.5 20.0 3.0 12.0 20.0 10.0 9.0 13 SR 5100 12.0 12.0 18.0 18.0 10.5 9 16.0 17.0 11.0 18.0 20.5 6.0 12.0 15.0 13.0 10.0 12.0 16.0 7.0 21.0 9.0 4.0 23.0 12.5 23.0 14.5 14.0 12.0 14.5 14 BRITTANY 14.0 24.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 10 8.0 23.0 19.0 16.5 9.0 20.0 18.0 8.0 2.5 18.5 15.0 6.5 11.0 7.5 17.5 7.5 17.5 19.0 21.5 5.0 7.0 7.0 19.5 15 BRIDGEPORT 20.0 9.5 17.0 14.0 22.0 21 18.0 12.0 20.0 24.0 16.5 9.0 18.0 10.5 9.0 11.5 22.0 19.0 11.0 3.0 10.5 4.0 20.0 9.0 16.0 14.5 20.0 19.0 3.0 16 ABT-CHW-1 22.5 5.5 14.0 16.0 16.5 14 16.0 14.5 4.0 14.0 3.5 12.5 15.5 20.0 5.0 21.0 9.0 5.0 13.5 22.0 15.0 24.0 15.0 5.0 24.0 23.0 11.0 16.5 5.5 17 MB-63 13.0 5.5 24.0 1.5 14.5 1 11.0 21.0 17.0 6.0 20.5 19.0 9.0 5.0 1.0 20.0 14.0 24.0 23.0 7.5 19.5 7.5 13.0 18.0 8.0 19.0 16.5 20.5 23.0 18 MAGIC 18.5 21.0 22.0 23.0 8.0 17 13.0 9.0 17.0 8.0 12.5 15.5 4.5 16.0 11.0 11.5 16.0 10.0 20.0 11.0 22.0 12.0 13.0 21.5 18.0 17.5 11.0 18.0 14.5 19 ACF 083 2.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 19.5 19 19.0 21.0 17.0 19.5 10.5 15.5 24.0 13.0 10.0 15.0 18.5 12.0 3.5 5.5 13.0 12.0 10.5 24.0 13.0 14.5 23.0 16.5 17.5 20 BANNER III 22.5 8.0 12.0 21.5 8.0 20 14.0 10.5 12.0 4.0 6.0 23.0 20.0 17.5 4.0 16.0 20.5 16.0 7.0 23.0 17.5 21.5 20.0 16.0 6.5 21.0 16.5 22.5 24.0 21 PST-4HM 1.0 1.0 22.0 16.0 23.0 23 20.5 24.0 13.5 16.5 15.0 1.5 23.0 24.0 24.0 9.0 10.0 23.0 17.0 24.0 2.0 21.5 3.0 7.0 20.0 6.0 24.0 24.0 22.0 22 SANDPIPER 16.5 9.5 20.0 10.0 24.0 14 23.0 6.5 23.0 23.0 23.0 24.0 22.0 1.0 16.5 22.0 20.5 3.0 24.0 15.5 24.0 12.0 17.5 10.0 14.5 10.0 16.5 20.5 5.5 23 JAMESTOWN II 24.0 18.0 19.0 3.0 19.5 16 24.0 18.5 24.0 19.5 18.5 22.0 1.0 17.5 18.5 24.0 24.0 20.0 20.0 18.5 23.0 4.0 24.0 11.0 14.5 24.0 16.5 22.5 2.0 24 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".