TABLE 8D. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS FOR EACH YEAR (SHADE) IN THE U.S. 1/ 1994-97 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME 1994 1995 1996 1997 1994-97 BRITTANY 1.0 1 7 2.0 1 SHADOW II (PST-44D) 3.0 2 3 8.0 2 NJ F-93 4.0 10 1 3.0 3 SR 5100 2.0 7 10 4.0 4 SANDPIPER (PRO 92/20) 8.5 3 9 6.0 5 TIFFANY 8.5 12 6 1.0 6 VICTORY (E) 7.0 8 4 10.0 7 SHADOW (E) 6.0 13 2 12.5 8 VICTORY II (PICK 4-91W) 5.0 4 15 16.0 9 ISI-FC-62 16.0 11 5 5.0 10 TMI-3CE 18.0 17 8 7.0 11 BRIDGEPORT 10.5 5 20 21.0 12 TREAZURE (ZPS-MG) 21.5 6 16 22.0 13 BANNER II 13.0 9 14 17.5 14 JAMESTOWN 21.5 21 11 14.0 15 BANNER III (MB 61-93) 10.5 15 19 24.0 16 CULUMBRA (MB 64-93) 14.0 14 23 17.5 17 MB 66-93 16.0 22 18 11.0 18 CASCADE 20.0 23 21 15.0 19 K-2 (MB 65-93) 16.0 19 22 20.0 20 ECO (MB 63-93) 19.0 18 13 19.0 21 JAMESTOWN II 12.0 20 24 26.0 22 MOLINDA 24.0 25 17 12.5 23 MEDINA 26.0 24 12 9.0 24 WX3-FF54 23.0 16 25 25.0 25 DARWIN 25.0 26 26 23.0 26 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".