TABLE 6D. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS FOR EACH YEAR (FULL SUN) IN THE U.S. 1/ 1994-97 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME 1994 1995 1996 1997 1994-97 SHADOW II (PST-44D) 1 1 4 1 1 BANNER III (MB 61-93) 4 5 3 5 2 BRITTANY 5 4 2 6 3 SR 5100 7 3 1 7 4 CULUMBRA (MB 64-93) 2 6 7 4 5 ECO (MB 63-93) 3 12 10 11 6 VICTORY II (PICK 4-91W) 9 2 5 2 7 NJ F-93 6 8 6 3 8 TIFFANY 8 7 9 9 9 BRIDGEPORT 11 10 8 8 10 TREAZURE (ZPS-MG) 10 9 11 13 11 WX3-FF54 13 13 12 12 12 K-2 (MB 65-93) 12 15 19 18 13 TMI-3CE 16 11 14 16 14 SANDPIPER (PRO 92/20) 14 17 13 14 15 JAMESTOWN II 17 18 15 10 16 VICTORY (E) 15 16 18 15 17 BANNER II 20 20 17 19 18 SHADOW (E) 18 19 20 20 19 ISI-FC-62 21 14 16 17 20 MB 66-93 22 21 22 23 21 DARWIN 19 22 24 25 22 JAMESTOWN 23 23 21 21 23 MEDINA 24 25 25 24 24 MOLINDA 25 24 23 22 25 CASCADE 26 26 26 26 26 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".