TABLE 3D. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN AT ELEVEN LOCATIONS (FULL SUN) IN THE U.S. 1/ 1997 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME IA1 IL1 IL2 KY1 ME1 NJ1 NJ2 OK1 UB1 WA1 WI1 MEAN SHADOW II (PST-44D) 1.0 1 1.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 13.0 11.5 13.0 18.0 1 VICTORY II (PICK 4-91W) 4.0 12 10.5 8.0 2.5 3.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 4.0 2 NJ F-93 17.5 6 9.0 1.5 4.0 2.0 5.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 7.5 3 CULUMBRA (MB 64-93) 9.5 19 6.0 1.5 7.0 8.0 2.5 17.5 10.0 1.0 2.0 4 BANNER III (MB 61-93) 5.0 19 2.0 4.0 21.5 10.5 14.0 6.5 7.5 5.0 11.5 5 BRITTANY 13.0 12 17.0 5.0 7.0 6.5 10.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 15.0 6 SR 5100 20.0 5 10.5 7.0 7.0 14.0 11.0 9.0 2.5 19.0 1.0 7 BRIDGEPORT 17.5 3 23.5 9.5 14.0 9.0 2.5 2.0 4.0 11.5 4.0 8 TIFFANY 11.0 2 5.0 13.5 2.5 10.5 7.5 11.0 16.5 6.0 7.5 9 JAMESTOWN II 7.5 7 13.0 16.0 7.0 15.5 5.0 13.0 5.0 24.5 4.0 10 ECO (MB 63-93) 15.0 9 13.0 3.0 21.5 6.5 12.0 3.5 19.0 2.0 21.5 11 WX3-FF54 7.5 19 13.0 17.0 11.0 5.0 19.0 22.0 13.5 11.5 11.5 12 TREAZURE (ZPS-MG) 13.0 9 15.5 20.0 17.5 4.0 16.0 17.5 16.5 21.0 11.5 13 SANDPIPER (PRO 92/20) 23.0 9 22.0 6.0 10.0 12.0 16.0 16.0 7.5 22.5 21.5 14 VICTORY (E) 3.0 23 3.0 15.0 24.0 18.0 22.0 10.0 11.5 22.5 23.5 15 TMI-3CE 24.5 26 7.0 13.5 14.0 15.5 9.0 6.5 13.5 24.5 6.0 16 ISI-FC-62 16.0 14 19.0 12.0 23.0 19.0 18.0 8.0 9.0 15.0 20.0 17 K-2 (MB 65-93) 2.0 4 19.0 18.5 7.0 13.0 25.0 15.0 21.0 9.0 25.0 18 BANNER II 9.5 21 21.0 9.5 19.0 20.0 7.5 23.0 15.0 19.0 16.5 19 SHADOW (E) 13.0 24 26.0 21.0 14.0 17.0 16.0 13.0 18.0 19.0 16.5 20 JAMESTOWN 24.5 16 19.0 22.0 12.0 24.5 20.5 24.0 20.0 9.0 11.5 21 MOLINDA 19.0 22 23.5 24.0 20.0 24.5 23.0 19.0 22.0 17.0 11.5 22 MB 66-93 22.0 16 15.5 18.5 26.0 22.0 26.0 21.0 25.0 15.0 23.5 23 MEDINA 6.0 16 25.0 25.0 16.0 21.0 20.5 20.0 24.0 4.0 19.0 24 DARWIN 21.0 12 4.0 26.0 17.5 23.0 13.0 26.0 26.0 15.0 11.5 25 CASCADE 26.0 25 8.0 23.0 25.0 26.0 24.0 25.0 23.0 26.0 26.0 26 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".