TABLE 3F. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF HARD FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN AT TWENTY-THREE LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. 1995 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME GAl GA2 IAl ILl IL2 KS1 KY1 LA1 MAl MD1 MD2 ME1 MIl M01 NJl NJ2 OH1 OK1 PAl Rll UB1 VAl WAl MEAN DISCOVERY 9.0 6.0 1.0 2 7.0 2.0 3.0 13 1.0 1.0 12.0 1.0 7.5 5.5 2 1.0 4.5 1 2.0 4.0 5.0 2.0 1.5 1 SR 3100 1.0 4.5 8.0 1 12.0 6.0 5.5 2 2.0 5.5 11.0 6.0 14.0 7.0 3 3.0 6.5 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 4.5 2 RELIANT II 8.0 10.0 10.0 5 2.0 3.0 4.0 11 9.0 5.5 1.5 9.5 9.0 1.0 7 2.0 4.5 2 3.0 5.0 3.5 4.0 11.0 3 MS 82-93 11.0 3.0 2.5 8 3.0 1.0 1.0 1 5.0 9.0 10.0 5.0 1.5 4.0 1 13.0 1.0 3 12.0 6.5 10.0 11.5 1.5 4 OSPREY (PRO 92/24) 3.0 9.0 2.5 12 1.0 7.0 2.0 10 3.0 2.0 1.5 7.0 11.0 8.0 9 5.5 13.0 11 7.5 2.0 3.5 1.0 10.0 5 ECOSTAR 7.0 8.0 4.0 4 5.5 4.0 10.5 14 5.0 11.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 3.0 4 7.5 10.5 5 9.5 6.5 6.5 8.0 3.0 6 MB 81-93 6.0 11.0 5.0 13 8.0 9.0 5.5 7 13.5 3.0 9.0 3.0 4.5 9.5 5 4.0 10.5 6 6.0 3.0 6.5 9.0 6.0 7 AURORA W/ENDO. 2.0 13.0 13.0 6 5.5 5.0 12.0 12 5.0 11.0 5.0 8.0 10.0 2.0 6 5.5 6.5 10 11.0 9.5 8.0 3.0 8.0 8 NORDIC 10.0 7.0 11.0 7 4.0 10.0 7.0 8 7.0 7.0 13.0 12.0 4.5 9.5 8 7.5 3.0 7 4.0 8.0 2.0 6.0 4.5 9 VERNON (MB 83-93) 4.5 4.5 6.5 3 14.0 11.0 9.0 3 11.0 8.0 8.0 9.5 12.0 5.5 10 11.0 10.5 8 5.0 9.5 13.0 11.5 12.0 10 SPARTAN 4.5 1.0 12.0 10 12.0 12.0 8.0 6 13.5 4.0 4.0 13.0 3.0 13.5 11 12.0 2.0 14 9.5 11.0 9.0 10.0 7.0 11 BRIGADE 12.5 2.0 6.5 9 10.0 8.0 10.5 9 8.0 11.0 14.0 11.0 7.5 12.0 12 9.0 8.0 9 14.0 12.0 12.0 7.0 9.0 12 SCALDIS 14.0 12.0 9.0 11 12.0 13.5 14.0 4 10.0 14.0 6.5 4.0 1.5 13.5 13 10.0 14.0 13 7.5 13.0 11.0 13.0 14.0 13 PAMELA 12.5 14.0 14.0 14 9.0 13.5 13.0 5 12.0 13.0 6.5 14.0 13.0 11.0 14 14.0 10.5 12 13.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 13.0 14 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".