TABLE 3E. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF STRONG CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN AT TWENTY-THREE LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. 1995 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME GAl GA2 IAl ILl IL2 KSI KY1 LA1 MAl MD1 MD2 ME1 MIl M01 NJl NJ2 OH1 OK1 PAl RIl UB1 VAl WAl MEAN PST-4VB ENDO. 4.5 13.5 4.0 1.0 4 3.5 6.0 9 2.0 11 2.0 1 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.5 1 PST-4ST 4.5 7.0 1.0 3.0 5 7.0 2.0 3 4.0 3 3.0 3 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 4.0 6.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 2 WX3-FFG6 1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 1 8.5 10.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 8 11.5 11.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 9.5 1.0 4.5 3 SHADEMASTER 11 12.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 2 1.0 1.0 5 10.0 4 5.0 2 6.5 1.0 1.5 6.0 5.5 7.5 7.0 6.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4 JASPER (E) 2.0 2.0 5.0 8.0 9 6.0 3.0 4 4.0 6 6.0 6 9.5 6.5 6.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 5.0 7.5 5 PST-4DT 7.0 10.5 6.0 4.0 3 8.5 4.5 10 4.0 2 7.0 4 4.5 9.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 3.5 5.0 6.0 7.5 6 FLYER 11 (ZPS-4BN) 3.0 7.0 9.0 2.0 6 3.5 4.5 6 8.0 10 4.0 5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 13.0 10.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.5 7 ARUBA 9.0 13.5 7.0 7.0 11 12.5 7.0 8 6.5 14 11.5 9 9.5 6.5 8.5 12.0 12.0 13.0 8.5 13.0 11.0 8.0 10.0 8 FLYER 11.0 7.0 11.0 10.0 8 10.0 11.0 7 9.0 12 8.5 11 8.0 6.5 8.5 9.0 9.5 11.5 10.0 9.5 9.5 9.0 7.5 9 CAS-FR13 10.0 7.0 12.0 11.0 7 5.0 8.0 2 15.0 13 8.5 10 6.5 12.0 12.5 7.0 5.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.0 13.0 12.0 10 RONDO 6.0 13.5 13.0 9.0 10 14.0 15.0 11 6.5 6 13.0 15 3.0 15.0 11.0 10.5 14.0 11.5 11.0 12.0 8.0 10.5 7.5 11 BAR FRR 4ZBD 15.0 13.5 9.0 12.0 14 2.0 9.0 15 12.0 9 i5.0 7 11.5 6.5 10.0 13.5 9.5 14.0 14.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12 BAR UR 204 8.0 7.0 9.0 13.5 13 12.5 12.0 12 13.0 6 11.5 13 13.0 13.0 12.5 15.0 15.0 7.5 14.0 9.5 13.0 14.0 14.0 13 WVPB-STCR-101 14.0 3.0 14.5 15.0 15 15.0 13.0 13 14.0 8 10.0 12 15.0 10.0 14.0 13.5 8.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 10.5 15.0 14 COMMON CREEPING 13.0 10.5 14.5 13.5 12 11.0 14.0 14 11.0 15 14.0 14 14.0 14.0 15.0 10.5 11.0 15.0 12.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 13.0 15 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".