TABLE 3D. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS 1/ GROWN AT TWENTY-THREE LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. 1995 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME GAl GA2 IAl ILI IL2 KS1 KY1 LAI MA1 MD1 MD2 ME1 MIl M01 NJl NJ2 OH1 OKI PAl RIl UB1 VAl WAl MEAN PST-44D 4.0 14.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 12.5 1.0 14 7.0 1.5 4.5 3.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 24.0 14.5 1.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1 BRITTANY 1.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 5 17.5 1.5 1.0 14.0 2.5 10.0 6.0 9.0 4.0 5.0 5.5 21.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2 PICK 4-91w 6.0 10.0 4.0 2.5 1.0 5.0 2.0 20 2.0 4.5 2.5 10.5 20.5 1.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 7.5 4.0 7.0 3.0 6.0 17.0 3 SR 5100 3.0 1.0 14.0 8.0 3.0 23.0 7.0 1 4.0 11.0 7.0 13.0 10.5 10.0 12.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 9.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 20.0 4 MB 61-93 13.0 12.5 12.0 5.0 7.5 6.5 4.5 18 1.0 11.0 17.0 6.5 16.0 19.5 5.0 7.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 16.5 7.0 11.5 12.0 5 MB 64-93 14.0 15.5 2.0 4.0 7.5 2.0 11.0 6 3.0 21.0 15.0 5.0 5.5 6.5 10.0 13.5 18.0 9.5 7.0 3.5 8.5 13.0 5.5 6 TREAZURE (ZPS-MG) 8.5 17.5 5.5 16.0 5.0 11.0 17.0 13 10.0 17.5 6.0 18.5 5.5 4.0 8.0 5.0 3.0 17.5 8.0 9.0 8.5 14.5 5.5 7 TIFFANY 15.0 20.0 20.0 2.5 4.0 8.5 9.0 23 8.0 4.5 15.0 9.0 12.5 6.5 4.0 5.0 23.0 6.0 3.0 2.0 11.5 3.0 3.5 8 BRIDGEPORT 2.0 2.0 18.0 11.0 21.0 12.5 10.0 16 11.5 14.5 4.5 18.5 9.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 4.0 11.0 19.5 5.0 17.0 17.0 9 NJ F-93 10.0 9.0 24.0 21.0 24.0 14.0 4.5 9 5.0 17.5 9.0 3.5 16.0 13.5 3.0 3.0 1.0 7.5 22.0 3.5 10.0 10.0 22.0 10 TMI-3CE 11.0 12.5 10.0 10.0 14.0 10.0 13.0 2 21.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 25.5 22.5 17.5 10.0 6.5 16.0 14.0 1.0 15.0 17.0 12.0 11 ECO (MB 63-93) 7.0 8.0 8.0 15.0 19.0 4.0 3.0 15 13.0 3.0 22.0 1.5 2.5 24.0 2.0 21.5 13.5 2.5 17.0 12.5 11.5 19.0 23.0 12 WX3-FF54 5.0 5.0 11.0 9.0 9.0 6.5 19.0 11 19.5 14.5 15.0 6.5 20.5 17.5 13.5 11.0 11.5 22.5 12.5 14.0 16.0 6.0 7.0 13 SANDPIPER (PRO 92/20) 12.0 3.5 22.5 19.0 12.5 19.0 7.0 7 26.0 6.5 2.5 17.0 14.0 2.5 13.5 17.0 17.0 12.0 15.0 16.5 13.5 9.0 17.0 14 VICTORY (E) 8.5 7.0 5.5 18.0 12.5 22.0 14.0 22 15.5 9.0 8.0 20.0 7.5 19.5 15.0 13.5 6.5 9.5 16.0 16.5 19.0 6.0 24.0 15 ISI-FC-62 21.5 3.5 3.0 12.0 15.0 8.5 12.0 32 4.0 14.5 10.0 10.5 16.0 5.0 23.0 17.0 19.0 14.5 19.0 16.5 20.0 24.0 2.0 16 K-2 (MR 65-93) 18.0 11.0 13.0 13.5 11.0 3.0 15.5 25 6.0 19.5 19.0 8.0 7.5 10.0 11.0 19.5 20.0 17.5 20.5 10.5 6.0 17.0 14.5 17 JAMESTOWN II 19.0 17.5 8.0 6.0 22.0 16.5 20.5 19 11.5 22.0 20.0 22.0 4.0 26.0 21.0 13.5 16.0 11.0 5.5 19.5 18.0 11.5 8.5 18 SHADOW (E) 17.0 15.5 16.5 13.5 17.0 15.0 20.5 17 9.0 6.5 13.0 24.5 23.0 13.5 16.0 13.5 11.5 19.0 20.5 23.0 17.0 23.0 20.0 19 BANNER II 16.0 23.0 15.0 25.0 23.0 18.0 18.0 41 5.5 11.0 11.0 22.0 10.5 10.0 19.0 17.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 24.0 21.0 22.0 10.0 20 MS 66-93 23.0 24.0 21.0 22.0 10.0 16.5 15.5 82 3.0 23.5 23.0 16.0 20.5 16.0 20.0 25.0 21.5 24.0 18.0 10.5 22.0 21.0 12.0 21 JAMESTOWN 21.5 21.0 22.5 24.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 21 22.0 19.5 18.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 21.5 21.5 20.0 24.0 25.0 25.0 14.5 8.5 22 DARWIN 20.0 22.0 25.0 20.0 20.0 24.0 26.0 26 14.0 25.0 25.0 1.5 24.0 15.0 17.5 19.5 . 21.0 10.0 8.0 13.5 6.0 14.5 23 MOLINDA 24.0 25.0 19.0 23.0 25.0 21.0 24.0 10 17.5 14.5 26.0 24.5 12.5 25.0 22.0 24.0 15.0 22.5 26.0 22.0 24.0 20.0 25.0 24 MEDINA 26.0 26.0 16.5 17.0 16.0 25.0 23.0 24 19.5 23.5 24.0 22.0 20.5 17.5 25.0 23.0 25.0 26.0 23.0 12.5 23.0 25.0 20.0 25 CASCADE 25.0 19.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 25.0 12 25.0 26.0 21.0 26.0 25.5 22.5 26.0 26.0 9.0 25.0 25.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".