TABLE 3D. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CHEWINGS FESCUE CULTIVARS GROWN AT EIGHTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1/ 1992 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AL1 IA1 ID2 IN1 KY1 MD1 MI1 NJ1 NJ2 NJ3 OH2 OR2 OR9 PA1 PA2 RI1 UB1 WA1 MEAN SOUTHPORT 6.0 24.5 21.0 4.5 2.5 29.0 1.0 7.5 9.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 22.0 25.5 10.0 4.0 3.5 1 BRIDGEPORT (N-105) 4.0 4.5 11.5 15.0 2.5 13.5 5.0 2.0 5.5 4.5 2.5 7.5 15.5 4.0 12.5 10.0 2.0 10.0 2 TIFFANY (PST-4CD) 8.5 13.5 19.0 6.0 1.0 12.0 11.5 3.5 14.0 2.5 2.5 11.0 8.5 9.0 12.5 1.0 8.0 17.5 3 SR 5000 2.0 13.5 1.0 3.0 7.5 9.0 11.5 7.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 21.5 18.0 15.5 22.0 6.5 1.0 32.0 4 LONGFELLOW 7.0 21.0 4.5 7.0 11.0 1.5 11.5 5.0 25.0 4.5 5.0 21.5 10.0 12.0 12.5 6.5 3.0 2.0 5 JAMESTOWN II 5.0 18.5 6.0 12.5 6.0 4.5 2.5 11.5 10.0 8.0 5.0 20.0 21.0 12.0 22.0 23.0 5.0 6.5 6 PROFORMER (JMB-89) 1.0 32.0 23.0 2.0 5.0 6.0 11.5 3.5 27.0 7.0 7.5 10.0 17.0 22.0 17.0 16.5 6.0 27.0 7 SHADOW W/ENDO. (PST-SHE) 8.5 15.5 9.5 14.0 4.0 35.0 19.0 11.5 12.5 2.5 11.0 5.0 13.0 28.0 17.0 8.0 7.0 13.0 8 89.LKR . 4.5 . 1.0 9.0 1.5 . 9.5 12.5 10.0 . 4.0 5.0 4.0 22.0 25.0 11.0 5.0 9 DIGNITY (OFI 89-200) 10.0 22.5 3.0 12.5 10.0 34.0 11.5 1.0 26.0 9.0 11.0 32.5 13.0 18.0 22.0 10.0 9.0 6.5 10 PST-4FE 3.0 24.5 8.0 4.5 7.5 27.0 19.0 16.5 29.0 12.0 11.0 26.0 4.0 7.5 27.0 4.0 15.0 13.0 11 WALDORF 27.0 15.5 7.0 11.0 19.0 21.5 19.0 6.0 5.5 17.0 17.0 27.5 31.0 7.5 3.0 36.0 10.0 23.5 12 EPSOM 12.5 1.0 20.0 19.0 35.0 10.5 11.5 16.5 22.5 19.0 31.0 3.0 13.0 15.5 . 32.5 12.0 8.0 13 BANNER 15.0 35.5 27.0 8.0 16.5 4.5 11.5 14.0 28.0 11.0 11.0 32.5 23.5 35.5 32.5 27.5 13.0 20.5 14 MOLINDA 24.0 18.5 11.5 17.0 18.0 16.0 22.0 9.5 17.0 22.5 17.0 1.0 25.0 12.0 25.5 20.5 29.0 27.0 15 BARGREEN 12.5 4.5 17.0 30.0 33.0 32.0 33.5 14.0 1.0 13.0 17.0 17.5 8.5 2.0 8.5 16.5 20.0 17.5 16 ATLANTA 27.0 10.5 17.0 16.0 23.0 16.0 28.0 20.0 15.0 25.0 14.0 9.0 23.5 18.0 17.0 16.5 17.0 32.0 17 ENJOY 22.0 8.0 17.0 27.0 24.0 24.0 11.5 24.5 8.0 24.0 31.0 7.5 15.5 22.0 6.0 2.5 24.0 1.0 18 TROPHY (ESTORIL) 16.5 4.5 4.5 35.0 28.0 16.0 5.0 18.5 2.5 22.5 22.0 34.0 2.0 1.0 29.0 14.0 26.0 32.0 19 SHADOW 18.0 33.5 15.0 29.0 13.0 7.5 28.0 14.0 24.0 15.0 26.5 27.5 33.0 27.0 28.0 27.5 14.0 23.5 20 JAMESTOWN 14.0 35.5 30.5 21.0 12.0 7.5 28.0 21.0 17.0 18.0 11.0 31.0 29.0 34.0 30.5 22.0 16.0 36.0 21 ERG 1143 35.0 18.5 27.0 9.0 29.5 3.0 32.0 23.0 5.5 26.0 31.0 16.0 27.0 12.0 1.0 19.0 27.5 20.5 22 MARY 30.0 22.5 30.5 24.5 16.5 24.0 28.0 24.5 22.5 20.0 22.0 13.0 22.0 22.0 8.5 20.5 31.0 10.0 23 CAMARO 25.0 18.5 14.0 34.0 26.5 33.0 11.5 18.5 20.0 16.0 17.0 23.5 26.0 12.0 35.0 5.0 27.5 34.5 24 WILMA 11.0 33.5 33.5 10.0 21.0 30.0 11.5 36.0 31.0 21.0 17.0 36.0 20.0 31.0 22.0 25.0 19.0 13.0 25 RAYMOND 19.5 29.5 24.0 22.0 29.5 31.0 23.5 35.0 17.0 27.0 26.5 19.0 7.0 25.0 8.5 16.5 22.5 17.5 26 DOVER (NK 82492) 19.5 27.0 27.0 18.0 36.0 27.0 28.0 31.5 35.0 14.0 7.5 25.0 36.0 29.0 32.5 12.0 18.0 27.0 27 SCARLET 34.0 8.0 33.5 20.0 22.0 27.0 19.0 34.0 34.0 33.5 31.0 6.0 19.0 18.0 12.5 2.5 30.0 15.0 28 PUMA 32.0 27.0 9.5 27.0 26.5 21.5 19.0 31.5 20.0 30.0 22.0 14.0 32.0 32.5 17.0 30.0 22.5 17.5 29 BARLANDER (BAR FR 9F) 31.0 8.0 25.0 36.0 15.0 10.5 35.0 22.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 17.5 1.0 30.0 2.0 30.0 34.5 23.5 30 KOKET 21.0 29.5 22.0 23.0 14.0 13.5 28.0 29.0 20.0 28.5 22.0 15.0 35.0 35.5 34.0 30.0 36.0 29.5 31 FERNANDO (HF 112) 16.5 2.0 29.0 33.0 31.0 20.0 2.5 33.0 11.0 28.5 34.5 35.0 6.0 6.0 17.0 13.0 34.5 3.5 32 SIMONE (LD 3485) 23.0 10.5 2.0 27.0 32.0 24.0 23.5 26.0 2.5 36.0 34.5 30.0 30.0 26.0 4.0 32.5 33.0 34.5 33 RAINBOW 27.0 12.0 35.0 31.0 34.0 18.5 5.0 28.0 31.0 35.0 22.0 23.5 11.0 4.0 5.0 25.0 32.0 10.0 34 CAPITOL 29.0 27.0 32.0 24.5 25.0 36.0 28.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 26.5 12.0 28.0 22.0 8.5 35.0 21.0 29.5 35 BARNICA 33.0 31.0 13.0 32.0 20.0 18.5 33.5 27.0 33.0 33.5 26.5 29.0 34.0 32.5 30.5 34.0 25.0 23.5 36 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".