TABLE 3C.  RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF SLENDER CREEPING FESCUE CULTIVARS
                                                      AT TWENTY-TWO LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. AND CANADA  1/
                                                                         1991 DATA

                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/

                           NAME                   AL1     IA1     ID2    IL1    IL2     IN1    KY1     MD1    MI1     MN1    NE1

                           FRT-30149                3     4.5     6.0      2    6.0     5.0      3     5.5    7.5     1.0    6.0
                           BARCROWN                 8     3.0     9.0      8    3.0     6.0      2    10.0    5.5     7.5    3.0
                           MARKER                   7    10.0     2.0      5    9.5     1.0      5     3.5    2.5     3.0    1.0
                           SMIRNA (ZW 42-160)       2     7.0     4.0      6    8.0     2.5      4     1.0    4.0     7.5    4.0
                           HF 138                   4     4.5    10.0      1    1.0     8.0      1     2.0    1.0     7.5    2.0
                           BARSKOL (BAR FR 9P)      9     2.0     1.0      8    7.0     2.5      6     3.5    5.5     3.0    5.0
                           NAPOLI (LD 3488)         6     8.0     5.0      4    2.0     9.0      9     5.5    9.5     5.0    8.0
                           DAWSON                   1     1.0     7.5      3    4.0     4.0      7     8.0    2.5     3.0    7.0
                           BARLOTTE                10     6.0     3.0     10    5.0     7.0     10     9.0    7.5     7.5    9.5
                           COMFORT (HF 102)         5     9.0     7.5      8    9.5    10.0      8     7.0    9.5    10.0    9.5


                       TABLE 3C.      RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF SLENDER CREEPING FESCUE CULTIVARS
                       (CONTINUED)                    AT TWENTY-TWO LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. AND CANADA
                                                                         1991 DATA

                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING

                       NAME                    NJ1    NJ2     NJ3    OR2    OR9    PA1    PA2     RI1    SK1     UB1    WA1    MEAN

                       FRT-30149               1.0      3     3.0      4      5      6    4.5     1.0      2     4.5      6      1
                       BARCROWN                2.0      5     1.0      2      4      1    3.0     2.0      5     2.5      3      2
                       MARKER                  8.0     10     5.0      3      3      2    4.5    10.0      4     2.5      2      3
                       SMIRNA (ZW 42-160)      8.0      7    10.0      5      2      3     .      9.0      7     1.0      6      4
                       HF 138                  3.5      4     2.0     10      7      9    8.0     7.5      3     6.0      4      5
                       BARSKOL (BAR FR 9P)     5.0      9     4.0      6      1      7    1.5     4.5      7    10.0      8      6
                       NAPOLI (LD 3488)       10.0      1     6.0      1      6      5    7.0     3.0     10     8.0      1      7
                       DAWSON                  6.0      6     9.0      7      8      4    9.0     7.5      7     7.0      6      8
                       BARLOTTE                3.5      8     7.5      9      9      8    6.0     6.0      1     9.0     10      9
                       COMFORT (HF 102)        8.0      2     7.5      8     10     10    1.5     4.5      9     4.5      9     10

 1/  THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR
     ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS.  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1.

 2/  RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.
     FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".