TABLE 3B. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS AT TWENTY-TWO LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. AND CANADA 1/ 1991 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AL1 IA1 ID2 IL1 IL2 IN1 KY1 MD1 MI1 MN1 NE1 PST-4R3 6.0 4.5 19.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 2.0 18.5 14.0 17.5 3.0 PST-43F 9.0 3.0 1.0 13.0 12.5 6.0 5.0 1.5 2.5 9.5 2.0 CINDY 15.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 6.0 8.0 5.0 8.0 1.0 5.5 PST-4C8 1.0 2.0 2.5 8.0 8.5 6.0 9.5 12.5 2.5 5.5 12.5 JASPER 4.0 8.0 2.5 7.0 6.0 2.0 15.0 15.5 4.5 13.0 1.0 SALEM 5.0 7.0 14.0 12.0 12.5 1.0 1.0 3.0 8.0 17.5 4.0 HERALD 9.0 1.0 9.5 4.0 4.5 6.0 19.0 5.0 1.0 5.5 14.5 VISTA 3.0 9.0 7.5 2.0 1.5 6.0 4.0 15.5 18.0 9.5 5.5 SHADEMASTER 14.0 10.5 11.0 6.0 3.0 9.5 6.0 7.5 18.0 2.5 7.5 PST-4NI 12.0 4.5 22.0 3.0 7.0 12.0 3.0 10.0 4.5 13.0 7.5 FLYER 7.0 12.5 21.0 9.0 16.0 14.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 5.5 10.0 REVERE (NK 88001) 2.0 18.5 16.5 18.0 12.5 21.0 12.0 15.5 14.0 9.5 16.5 WW RS 138 24.5 10.5 6.0 23.0 23.0 21.0 9.5 5.0 18.0 17.5 12.5 TALUS (LD 3438) 9.0 26.0 15.0 26.0 25.0 13.0 21.0 18.5 22.0 5.5 10.0 BELVEDERE 15.5 18.5 26.0 15.0 20.0 9.5 16.0 1.5 24.0 17.5 14.5 CLAUDIA 13.0 18.5 12.5 16.0 22.0 27.0 11.0 15.5 8.0 13.0 19.5 COLLO (LD 3414) 18.0 22.5 16.5 14.0 12.5 16.0 23.5 11.0 22.0 17.5 10.0 ELANOR 17.0 22.5 4.0 20.5 26.0 26.0 23.5 27.0 26.0 9.5 22.0 WW RS 130 26.0 12.5 7.5 23.0 18.0 11.0 26.0 25.0 11.5 17.5 19.5 WW RS 143 27.0 18.5 9.5 23.0 16.0 21.0 20.0 23.0 8.0 23.0 23.5 SUNSET (ZW 42-158) 21.0 16.0 20.0 17.0 24.0 14.5 18.0 20.5 18.0 25.5 16.5 BARIM (BAR FR8RC3) 20.0 24.0 23.0 20.5 16.0 23.0 13.5 23.0 25.0 21.0 19.5 ENSYLVA 19.0 26.0 25.0 10.5 8.5 17.5 25.0 20.5 18.0 25.5 26.0 BOREAL 22.0 15.0 12.5 19.0 19.0 19.0 13.5 12.5 14.0 23.0 27.0 SYLVESTER 23.0 26.0 18.0 25.0 21.0 17.5 27.0 26.0 22.0 2.5 25.0 BARGENA 11.0 14.0 24.0 10.5 4.5 25.0 22.0 23.0 27.0 27.0 23.5 FRANKLIN 24.5 21.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 24.0 17.0 9.0 11.5 23.0 19.5 TABLE 3B. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF CREEPING RED FESCUE CULTIVARS (CONTINUED) AT TWENTY-TWO LOCATIONS IN THE U.S. AND CANADA 1991 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING NAME NJ1 NJ2 NJ3 OR2 OR9 PA1 PA2 RI1 SK1 UB1 WA1 MEAN PST-4R3 1.0 1.0 1.0 12.5 4.5 16.5 22.0 10.5 15.5 1.0 18.0 1 PST-43F 2.0 17.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 7.5 13.5 1.0 11.0 6.5 9.0 2 CINDY 12.5 6.5 16.0 2.0 1.0 4.5 4.0 2.5 1.0 17.0 1.0 3 PST-4C8 3.5 8.5 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 8.5 13.0 8.0 11.0 13.0 4 JASPER 9.0 5.0 2.0 4.0 6.5 2.0 13.5 5.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 5 SALEM 11.0 6.5 6.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 8.5 6.0 6.0 2.0 4.0 6 HERALD 7.0 18.5 7.5 7.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 6.5 9.0 7 VISTA 5.5 3.5 12.5 1.0 17.0 13.0 4.0 17.5 13.0 6.5 13.0 8 SHADEMASTER 5.5 13.0 9.5 6.0 8.0 10.0 2.0 22.5 15.5 3.0 18.0 9 PST-4NI 3.5 3.5 12.5 16.0 6.5 4.5 18.0 2.5 25.0 6.5 4.0 10 FLYER 9.0 10.0 9.5 21.5 9.0 14.5 13.5 13.0 21.0 12.0 4.0 11 REVERE (NK 88001) 24.0 16.0 23.0 12.5 18.0 16.5 1.0 15.0 6.0 14.0 9.0 12 WW RS 138 16.0 2.0 16.0 9.0 15.0 7.5 8.5 17.5 3.5 14.0 18.0 13 TALUS (LD 3438) 14.5 11.0 20.5 8.0 11.0 10.0 18.0 22.5 21.0 9.0 9.0 14 BELVEDERE 12.5 12.0 3.0 27.0 24.0 18.5 22.0 4.0 9.0 10.0 27.0 15 CLAUDIA 23.0 21.5 14.0 17.0 16.0 23.0 8.5 8.0 18.0 20.5 26.0 16 COLLO (LD 3414) 9.0 18.5 26.5 15.0 23.0 12.0 18.0 22.5 25.0 17.0 20.5 17 ELANOR 19.5 8.5 7.5 23.5 21.0 18.5 18.0 22.5 18.0 20.5 4.0 18 WW RS 130 17.5 24.5 22.0 18.5 13.0 24.5 26.5 25.0 3.5 24.5 13.0 19 WW RS 143 14.5 20.0 20.5 26.0 13.0 14.5 13.5 17.5 14.0 17.0 9.0 20 SUNSET (ZW 42-158) 19.5 27.0 18.5 11.0 20.0 10.0 8.5 20.0 11.0 22.0 20.5 21 BARIM (BAR FR8RC3) 21.0 14.5 18.5 14.0 13.0 20.0 18.0 17.5 18.0 24.5 24.0 22 ENSYLVA 17.5 14.5 25.0 25.0 22.0 21.5 8.5 10.5 23.0 14.0 15.0 23 BOREAL 25.5 23.0 26.5 20.0 25.0 21.5 24.5 9.0 11.0 24.5 24.0 24 SYLVESTER 25.5 26.0 11.0 21.5 19.0 26.5 26.5 27.0 25.0 24.5 22.0 25 BARGENA 22.0 24.5 16.0 23.5 26.0 24.5 22.0 13.0 21.0 19.0 24.0 26 FRANKLIN 27.0 21.5 24.0 18.5 27.0 26.5 24.5 26.0 27.0 27.0 16.0 27 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".