TABLE 5A. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF BUFFALOGRASS CULTIVARS FOR EACH YEAR IN THE U.S. 1/ 1996-2000 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME 1996-97 1998 1999 2000 MEAN 91-118 1 1 1 1 1 CODY 2 3 3 2 2 TATANKA 4 5 4 5 3 BAM-1000 3 7 11 7 4 LEGACY (86-61) 9 2 2 11 5 BONNIE BRAE 7 6 6 9 6 TEXOKA 6 9 10 8 7 86-120 13 4 8 4 8 609 8 12 5 3 9 378 14 8 7 6 10 UCR-95 5 14 12 12 11 BISON 12 11 13 13 12 MIDGET 11 10 14 14 13 STAMPEDE 10 13 9 10 14 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES) THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 4. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".