TABLE 3.          RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF BENTGRASS CULTIVARS
                                               GROWN ON A MODIFIED SOIL GREEN AT NINE LOCATIONS IN THE U.S.  1/
                                                                         1991 DATA
                                                                             
                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/

                           NAME                      CA1     GA1     KS1     KY1     MA1     MI1     MS1     TX1     WA3    MEAN

                           PROVIDENCE                  .     1.0     1.0     1.0     3.5     1.0    13.0     4.0     6.0      1
                           PUTTER                      5     4.5     2.5    13.0    11.0     3.0    15.0     2.0     1.0      2
                           88.CBL                      .     3.0     5.5     5.5     3.5     2.0     1.0    15.5     7.0      3
                           WVPB 89-D-15 (LOPEZ)        9    12.0     8.5     4.0    10.0    15.0    11.0      .     12.0      4
                           SR 1020                     2     8.5     4.0    14.0     9.0     7.0     2.0     4.0     5.0      5
                           PENNLINKS                   8     2.0     8.5     7.0     2.0     9.5     4.5     9.0    10.0      6
                           FORBES 89-12 (PRO/CUP)      5     8.5    16.5    12.0     1.0     4.0     4.5     7.0     8.5      7
                           NORMARC 101 (REGENT)        7    10.5     2.5     8.5     6.0     5.5     4.5    11.0    13.0      8
                           MSCB-8                      5      .     13.5      .     12.0    14.0     4.5      .     21.0      9
                           COBRA                       1    14.0     8.5    15.0     5.0     9.5     8.0    15.5     8.5     10
                           88.CBE                     13    10.5     5.5     3.0     7.0    12.5     9.0    11.0    15.0     11
                           PENNCROSS                  11     4.5    11.5     8.5    13.0    11.0    11.0     7.0    22.0     12
                           CARMEN                     12     6.5    16.5    16.0    15.5     5.5    16.5    11.0    18.0     13
                           TAMU 88-1                   3    15.5    11.5    20.0     8.0     8.0    14.0    15.5    16.5     14
                           UM 84-01 (BISKA)           10     6.5    22.5    18.0    15.5    12.5    16.5    15.5    11.0     15
                           MSCB-6                      .    17.0    19.0      .     17.0    17.5     7.0      .     20.0     16
                           NATIONAL                   16    13.0    16.5     2.0    18.0    17.5    19.0     1.0    19.0     17
                           EMERALD                    14    15.5     8.5    10.0    21.0    16.0    23.0     7.0    14.0     18
                           EGMONT                     15    22.0    20.5     5.5    14.0    19.0    18.0      .      4.0     19
                           BARDOT                     17    20.0    13.5    17.0    19.0    21.0    11.0     4.0     3.0     20
                           TRACENTA                   18    19.0    22.5    11.0    20.0    22.5    22.0    15.5     2.0     21
                           ALLURE                     19    21.0    20.5      .     22.0    20.0    21.0      .     16.5     22
                           BR 1518                    20    18.0    16.5    19.0    23.0    22.5    20.0    15.5    23.0     23


                           1/  THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES), THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL
                               PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS.  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG 
                               ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1.

                           2/  RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN,
                               ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.  FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".