TABLE 3C.                                 RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF BERMUDAGRASS 
                                               CULTIVARS (SEEDED) AT SIXTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES  1/
                                                                         1989 DATA 
                                                                              
                                                QUALITY RANKINGS; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING  2/
 
       NAME                    AR1    AZ1    CA2    CA3    FL1    KS1    KS2    MD1    MO4    MS1    OK1    TX1    UB1    VA1    VA2    VA4    MEAN 
 
       NMS 3                    1      1      2      1     2.0    2.0    5.5    2.0    3.5     1      3     2.0     2     2.0    1.5    1.5      1 
       NMS 4                    2      2      1      2     1.0    1.0    3.5    4.5    3.5     2      1     3.0     1     1.0    1.5    1.5      2 
       NMS 1 (NUMEX-SAHARA)     3      4      4      3     4.5    3.5    3.5    4.5    7.0     6      2     1.0     3     4.5    5.0    3.0      3 
       NMS 14                   5      7      3      5     3.0    3.5    2.0    3.0    2.0     3      6     4.0     6     3.0    3.5    4.0      4 
       NMS 2                    6      5      5      6     4.5    5.0    5.5    1.0    1.0     4      5     5.5     5     4.5    3.5    5.0      5 
       GUYMON                   7      3      6      4     7.0    6.0    1.0    6.0    5.5     7      4     5.5     4     6.0    6.0    7.0      6 
       AZ. COMMON               4      6      7      7     6.0    7.0    7.0    7.0    5.5     5      7     7.0     7     7.0    7.0    6.0      7 

       1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES), THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL
          PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS.  TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG
          ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1.

       2/ RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN,
          ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION.  IF MEANS ARE TIED, THE MEAN OF THE RANKS THEY ARE TIED FOR IS USED.  FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO
          MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".