TABLE 3B. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF SEEDED BERMUDAGRASS CULTIVARS AT FOURTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1/ 1987 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS ; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AZ1 CA2 CA3 FL1 KS1 KS2 LA1 LA2 NMS 4 5 2 6.5 2 1.5 1 3 6.0 NMS 3 2 1 6.5 6 6.0 2 3 4.5 NMS 1 (NUMEX-SAHARA) 1 3 5.0 1 3.0 3 3 . NMS 2 3 5 1.0 3 5.0 7 6 2.0 NMS 14 5 4 3.0 5 1.5 5 3 2.0 AZ. COMMON 5 6 2.0 4 4.0 4 3 2.0 GUYMON 7 7 4.0 7 7.0 6 7 4.5 NAME MS1 MS2 NM1 OK1 UB1 VA1 MEAN NMS 4 2.0 2 1 4.0 1 1.5 1 NMS 3 1.0 6 2 5.0 3 5.0 2 NMS 1 (NUMEX-SAHARA) 3.5 2 4 1.0 2 1.5 3 NMS 2 3.5 2 5 2.0 4 3.5 4 NMS 14 5.0 4 7 3.0 6 3.5 5 AZ. COMMON 6.0 5 6 6.5 7 7.0 6 GUYMON 7.0 7 3 6.5 5 6.0 7 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES), THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF A OR VARIETIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG VARIETIES, REFER TO THE MEANS AND LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. IF MEANS ARE TIED, THE MEAN OF THE RANKS THEY ARE TIED FOR IS USED. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR HTE SECOND AND THIRD RANK, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".