TABLE 3A. RANKING OF MEAN TURFGRASS QUALITY RATINGS OF VEGETATIVE BERMUDAGRASS CULTIVARS AT FOURTEEN LOCATIONS IN THE U. S. 1/ 1987 DATA QUALITY RANKINGS ; 1=HIGHEST MEAN: STATE LOCATIONS REPORTING 2/ NAME AZ1 CA2 CA3 FL1 KS1 KS2 LA1 LA2 MSB-20 7.5 9.5 1.0 13.0 5.5 9.0 8.5 1.5 TIFWAY 4.5 2.0 5.0 8.0 2.0 5.5 8.5 7.5 TIFGREEN 2.0 14.0 10.5 20.0 7.5 14.0 3.5 3.5 TIFWAY II 7.5 3.0 2.0 10.0 1.0 5.5 8.5 12.5 MSB-10 12.5 4.0 16.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 8.5 12.5 NM 43 12.5 8.0 13.0 11.0 10.5 15.5 3.5 5.5 MSB-30 18.5 1.0 21.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 20.0 12.5 A-29 4.5 12.0 8.0 15.5 10.5 7.0 3.5 5.5 TUFCOTE 2.0 17.0 8.0 9.0 7.5 17.0 15.0 12.5 E-29 12.5 9.5 3.0 12.0 14.0 9.0 8.5 7.5 TEXTURF 10 20.0 6.0 17.0 15.5 5.5 9.0 15.0 12.5 CT-23 2.0 11.0 4.0 19.0 13.0 15.5 15.0 12.5 A-22 7.5 15.0 6.0 17.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 12.5 NM 507 16.0 7.0 14.0 1.0 15.5 3.5 15.0 19.5 NM 471 16.0 5.0 8.0 5.0 20.0 3.5 15.0 19.5 FB-119 7.5 18.0 18.0 6.5 18.5 19.0 3.5 3.5 VAMONT 18.5 20.0 12.0 14.0 17.0 21.0 1.0 1.5 MIDIRON 10.0 13.0 15.0 21.0 12.0 13.0 20.0 19.5 RS-1 16.0 16.0 10.5 18.0 15.5 20.0 20.0 12.5 NM 72 12.5 21.0 19.0 6.5 21.0 18.0 8.5 19.5 NM 375 21.0 19.0 20.0 2.0 18.5 11.0 15.0 17.0 NAME MS1 MS2 NM1 OK1 UB1 VA1 MEAN MSB-20 1.0 6.0 11.5 2.5 4.0 1.0 1 TIFWAY 6.0 10.5 4.0 11.0 6.5 2.0 2 TIFGREEN 2.5 4.0 9.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 3 TIFWAY II 5.0 8.0 2.0 16.0 6.5 9.5 4 MSB-10 4.0 4.0 3.0 17.5 8.0 14.0 5 NM 43 2.5 12.0 11.5 7.0 2.0 6.0 6 MSB-30 7.0 1.0 1.0 15.0 1.0 13.0 7 A-29 11.0 15.5 15.0 2.5 10.0 4.0 8 TUFCOTE 11.0 14.0 16.0 7.0 5.0 9.5 9 E-29 11.0 21.0 5.0 7.0 15.0 11.0 10 TEXTURF 10 9.0 4.0 14.0 1.0 9.0 7.0 11 CT-23 8.0 18.5 6.0 17.5 17.0 15.0 12 A-22 14.0 18.5 7.5 13.5 13.0 12.0 13 NM 507 13.0 13.0 7.5 11.0 12.0 21.0 14 NM 471 16.5 2.0 11.5 20.5 11.0 19.5 15 FB-119 16.5 8.0 18.0 13.5 18.5 16.0 16 VAMONT 21.0 10.5 20.0 7.0 18.5 3.0 17 MIDIRON 15.0 20.0 11.5 19.0 20.5 17.0 18 RS-1 20.0 17.0 19.0 7.0 20.5 8.0 19 NM 72 18.0 8.0 21.0 11.0 16.0 18.0 20 NM 375 19.0 15.5 17.0 20.5 14.0 19.5 21 1/ THIS TABLE CONTAINS NO STATISTICAL VALUES (LSD VALUES), THEREFORE IT SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO DETERMINE THE GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENTRY OR ENTRIES ACROSS SEVERAL LOCATIONS OR REGIONS. TO ASSESS STATISTICAL DIF- FERENCES AMONG ENTRIES, REFER TO THE MEANS & LSD VALUES FOUND IN TABLE 1. 2/ RANKING OF MEAN QUALITY IS ACHIEVED BY ASSIGNING "1" TO THE HIGHEST MEAN, "2" TO THE SECOND HIGHEST MEAN, ETC. FOR EACH LOCATION. IF MEANS ARE TIED THE MEAN OF THE RANKS THEY ARE TIED FOR IS USED. FOR EXAMPLE, IF TWO MEANS ARE TIED FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKS, BOTH ARE ASSIGNED "2.5".